Writ petition challenging a Family Court order directing the petitioner-wife to pay monthly maintenance pendente lite to her husband. Counsel sought repeated adjournments; the Court declined further adjournment and dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SASANKA SEKHAR SATAPATHY Designation: A.R.-CUM-SR. SECRETARY Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA C UTTA CK Date: 18-Mar-2024 19:13:41
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.2612 OF 2024
Gomati Jena
.... Petitioner
Mr. Pranab Mishra, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Biswajit Pattnayak, Advocate
-versus-
Ashok Kumar Sahoo …. Opp. Party
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
15.03.2024
s.s.satapathy
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court's direction to the wife to pay Rs.1,500/- per month maintenance pendente lite under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act should be interfered with.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gomati Jena
Ashok Kumar Sahoo
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
