Debasmita Samantray v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged cancellation of a building stone quarry lease, forfeiture of EMD and security deposit, blacklisting from future auctions and recovery as arrear of land revenue, contending no proper show-cause notice was given. The Court issued notice to the opposite parties and stayed operation of the impugned cancellation order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 25995 of 2024
Debasmita Samantray …..
Petitioner
Mr. Subir Palit, Sr. Advocate along with Ms. A. Pradhan, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
..... Opp. Parties
Mr. Rabi Narayan Mishra, Addl. Govt. Advocate
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
ORDER
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether cancellation of the stone quarry lease and forfeiture/blacklisting without adequate notice violates natural justice?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Debasmita Samantray
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
S.K. Sahoo
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court