Subhransu Sekhar Jena v. the Additionall District Magistrate
Case brief
What is this about?
of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.24970 of 2019
Subhransu Sekhar Jena & ors. …. Petitioners
None
-versus-
Additional District Magistrate, …. Opposite Parties
BBSR & ors.
Mr. S.S. Kanungo, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER
17.01.2024
Order No.
05. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners is absent on call.
3. Earlier also when the matter got listed on 12.01.2024,
learned Counsel for the Petitioner was found absent.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-
prosecution.
(S.K. MISHRA)
JUDGE
Banita
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BANITA PRIYADARSHINI PALEI Designation: SR. STENOGRAPHER Reason: AUTHENTICATION Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 18-Jan-2024 19:17:48
Page 1 of 1
Subhransu Sekhar Jena & ors.
Additional District Magistrate & BBSR & ors.
Sanjay Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court