Disposed¶28

Bijaya Kumar Sandha v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC23 Oct 2024WP(C)/24188/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RACP; one increment; pay-benefit grievance; representation to Superintendent of Police, Jajpur; Annexure-3 dated 16.09.2024; pending grievance; certiorari/mandamus prayer; direction to consider representation within four weeks; authenticated copy; writ petition disposed; Orissa High Court, Cuttack; Dr. Justice S.K. Panigrahi; State of Orissa.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Superintendent of Police, Jajpur (Opposite Party No.3) to consider the Petitioner's grievance vide Annexure-3 and pass a lawful order within a period of four weeks from the date of presentation of an authenticated copy of the order. ¶28

Bijaya Kumar Sandha Vs State of Odisha — Orissa HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P.(C) No.24188 of 2024

¶3

Bijaya Kumar Sandha

¶4

…. Petitioner(s)

¶5

Mr. Manoranjan Padhi, Adv.

¶6

-versus-

¶7

…. State of Orissa & Ors. Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Mr. Gyanaranjan Mohapatra, ASC

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

Order

No.

ORDER

23.10.2024

1 . This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

¶17

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶18

3. In filing this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has made the following prayer:-

¶19

“ The petitioner, therefore, prays that Your Lordship’s may graciously be pleased to admit the writ application, call for the records and after hearing the parties and issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari/mandamus or any other or further writ / writ(s), direction / directions directing the opp.parties to grant RACP and one increment in favor of the Petitioner for the interest of justice.

¶20

And pass any other order(s), direction(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deems fit and proper.”

¶21

4. During course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that before approaching this Court the

¶22

Petitioner has already ventilated his grievance before the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Superintendent of Police, Jajpur/Opposite Party No.3 vide Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication A nne xure-3 on 16.09.2024. He further submits that the said Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 23-Oct-2024 18:46:56

¶23

grievance of the Petitioner is still pending.

¶24

Page 1 of 2

¶25

5. He, accordingly, prays that a direction may be issued to the Opposite Party No.3 for considering the said grievance of the Petitioner.

¶26

6. Learned counsel for the State submits that he has no objection if the representation at the instance of the Petitioner is considered by the Opposite Party No.3 in accordance with law, which is stated to be pending as of now.

¶27

7. Considering the limited nature of grievance of the Petitioner, this Court directs the Superintendent of Police, Jajpur/Opposite Party No.3 to consider the grievance of the Petitioner vide Annexure-3 and pass a lawful order within a period of four weeks from the date of presentation of an authenticated copy of this order.

¶28

8. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶29

(Dr. S.K. Panigrahi) Judge

¶30

Ayaskanta

¶31

Signature Not Verified

¶32

Digitally Signed Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 23-Oct-2024 18:46:56

¶33

Page 2 of 2

Bijaya Kumar Sandha v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bijaya Kumar Sandha v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sukanta Dash Vs State of Odisha

Bhagaban Naik Vs State of Odisha

Purna Chandra Panda Vs Registrar of Cooperative Societies Odisha, Bbsr

Vijayalaxmi Nayak Vs State of Odisha

Pindapathar Large Size Adivasi Multi Purpose Cooperative Society (Lampcs) Ltd. Vs State of Odisha

Abhimanyu Ojha Vs State of Odisha