Partly allowed
Janmejaya Nayak v. Union of India
Orissa HCWP(C)/2288/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.2288 of 2019
Janmejaya Nayak …. Petitioner(s)
Mr. Biplab Mohanty, Adv. Ms. S. Patnaik, Adv.
-versus-
…. Union of India, &Ors. Opp. Party(s) Mr. U.R. Jena, Central Government Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
Order
No.
ORDER
22.11.2024
2 . Learned counsel for the parties are present. Judgment prepared in separate sheets is delivered and pronounced in open Court in the presence of learned counsel for the parties and the order is passed accordingly as follows:
3 . This Writ Petition is, accordingly, partially allowed.
( Dr. S.K. Panigrahi)
Judge
B.Jhankar
Signature Not Verified
Page 1 of 1
Digitally Signed Signed by: BHABAGRAHI JHANKAR Designation: AR-CUM-SR. SECRETARY Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUT TACK Date: 10-Dec-2024 11:41:13
Janmejaya Nayak
Union of India
Ors.
S.K. Panigrahi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court