Orissa High Court (Cuttack), W.P.(C) No.21749 of 2012, Sandhyarani Senapati v. State of Odisha & others; Order dated 23.02.2024 before Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra; writ petition disposed of for want of instruction after counsel H.N. Mohapatra filed a no-instruction memo; no rulings on merits.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.21749 of 2012
Sandhyarani Senapati
…. Petitioner
Mr. H.N. Mohapatra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & others …. Opposite Parties
Mr. B. Panigrahi, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER 23.02.2024
Order No.
04.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Mr. H.N. Mohapatra, learned Counsel for the Petitioner is present and renders no instruction. He files a memo to the said effect. The same be kept on record.
3. The Writ Petition stands disposed of due to want of instruction.
Kanhu
(S. K. Mishra) Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: KANHU BEHERA Designation: JUNIOR STENOGRAPHER Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack. Date: 24-Feb-2024 13:37:13
How this case reached the court
At the hearing, petitioner's counsel was present, rendered no instruction, and filed a memo to that effect, which the Judge directed be kept on record.¶2
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
