Writ petition where counsel agreed the petitioner's case was covered by the decision in Ashok Kumar Mohapatra v. State of Odisha, confirmed by this Court and the Supreme Court. The Court disposed of the petition directing the Opposite Parties to consider the petitioner's case accordingly within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.20715 of 2024
Dwarikanath Dash
Mr. Sadasiva Patra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha, represented through its Principal Secretary, School and Mass Education Department and Others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. S. Ghose, Additional Government Advocate
CORAM: SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER 19.9.2024
Order No.
Digitally Signed Signed by: MANAS KUMAR PANDA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, Cuttack Date: 20-Sep-2024 16:31:03
M.K. Panda
1 issue framed by the court
Should the petitioner's case be considered in light of the decision in Ashok Kumar Mohapatra v. State of Odisha?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ashok Kumar Mohapatra v. State of OdishaRelied on¶3
OA No.1668 of 2017 (Ashok Kumar Mohapatra v. State of Odisha)
Dwarikanath Dash
State of Odisha, represented through its Principal Secretary, School and Mass Education Department
B. P. RoutRay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
