Writ petition challenging a tender process; the State stated the tender process was cancelled, rendering the petition infructuous, and the court disposed of it accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 20479 of 2024
Maruti Construction Company, Gujarat
….. Petitioner
M/s. Abhishek Dash & associates, Advocates
vs.
State of Odisha and others
Opposite Parties
Ms. A. Dash, Addl. Standing Counsel Mr. Subrat Kumar Sahu, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Prabodh Chandra Nayak, Advocate (O.P.5)
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
11.11.2024
on behalf of the State of Odisha that the tender process in question has been cancelled and this writ petition has accordingly become infructuous.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh)
Chief Justice
(Savitri Ratho)
Arun/Ashok
Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ASHOK KUMAR JAGADEB MOHAPATRA Designation: Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 14-Nov-2024 11:40:52
Page 1 of 1
Maruti Construction Company, Gujarat
State of Odisha
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
