High Court of Orissa directed the opposite parties to reconsider the petitioner's case for rehabilitation appointment within four months based on Malayananda Sethy case principles, disposing of the writ petition.
Directed opposite parties to reconsider the petitioner's case for rehabilitation appointment within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGRAM DAS Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 20-Dec-2024 15:12:30
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.2030 of 2022
Baidyutika Das
…. Petitioner
Mr.M.Bisoi, Advocate
-versus-
…. Opp.Parties
…. State of Odisha & Ors. Opp.Parties Mr.G.Tripathy, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
19.12.2024 I.A. No.1197 of 2024
Order No.
W.P.(C) No.2030 of 2022
Page 1 of 2
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGRAM DAS Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 20-Dec-2024 15:12:30
(B.P. Routray) Judge
S.Das
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the opposite parties are directed to reconsider the petitioner's case for rehabilitation appointment in accordance with law and principles laid down in Malayananda Sethy case.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Malayananda Sethy vs. State of Orissa and othersApplied¶21
Malayananda Sethy vs. State of Orissa and others, 2022 (II) OLR (SC) – 1
Baidyutika Das
State of Odisha
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
