Counsel stated he could not contact the petitioner and had no instructions, filing a memo to that effect. The writ petition was dismissed with liberty to file a restoration application within one month if cause of action subsists.
Liberty to file restoration application within one month, if cause of action subsists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.20003 of 2019
Sanjay Kumar Prusty …. Petitioner(s)
Mr. Bibhuti Bhusan Mishra, Adv.
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. Debasis Mohapatra, ASC
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
Order No.
ORDER
25.09.2024
2 . Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that despite his
best effort, he has failed to contact the Petitioner. He has no instruction in the matter. He also files a memo to that effect.
3. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
4. Memo filed in Court today be kept on record.
5. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to approach this Court
by filing a restoration application within a period of one month, if any, cause of action subsists.
(Dr. S.K. Panigrahi)
Judge
Ayaskanta
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 26-Sep-2024 18:21:40
Page 1 of 1
Sanjay Kumar Prusty
State of Odisha
S.K. Panigrahi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
