Writ petition disposed of with a direction to the opposite parties to consider the petitioner's case in terms of the principles decided in Balabhadra Majhi v. State of Odisha within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.19807 of 2024
Surendranath Pradhan
…. Petitioner
Mr. Umakant Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha, represented through its Principal Secretary, School and Mass Education Department and Others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. S.K. Jena, Additional Government Advocate
CORAM: SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER 23.9.2024
Order No.
Signature Not Verified (B.P. Routray) Digitally Signed Judge Signed by: MANAS KUMAR PANDA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, Cuttack Date: 24-Sep-2024 11:13:42
M.K. Panda
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's case should be considered in terms of the principles laid down in Balabhadra Majhi v. State of Odisha.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Balabhadra Majhi v. State of OdishaApplied
2023 (Supp.I) OLR 311
Surendranath Pradhan
State of Odisha, represented through its Principal Secretary, School and Mass Education Department
Others
B.P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
