Writ petition challenging trial court orders directing plaintiffs to adduce evidence was disposed of as infructuous because the underlying suit had been dismissed for default; the interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 03-Jan-2024 15:03:56
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 19503 OF 2011 Bakreswar Dev and another …. Petitioners Mr. Nirmal K. Rath, Advocate
-versus-
Sashi Sahoo and others
…. Opp. Parties Mr. Sachidananda Sahoo, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
Order No.
ORDER 02.01.2024
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
ms
Page 1 of 1
Bakreswar Dev and another
Sashi Sahoo and others
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
