Chandra S.Pradhani Vs State

Pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 22.11.2024, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate produced the instruction provided by the RDC, Southern Division vide letter dtd.04.12.2024 enclosing therein the joint enquiry report submitted by the Addl. District Welfare Officer, Nabarangpur and Welfare Extension Officer, Tentulikhunti. The same be kept in record.

¶13

Basing on the instruction so provided learned Addl. Govt. Advocate contended that children of the present Petitioner have not availed any benefit of the certificate issued in favour of the Petitioner, which has been cancelled by the Committee vide impugned order dtd.26.08.2014, so passed in FCC Case No. 14 of 2013.

¶14

Heard Ms. S. Pattnaik, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. A. Tripathy, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate appearing for the Opp. Parties.

¶15

Page 1 of 3.

¶16

Even though the present writ petition has been filed challenging the final order dtd.26.08.2014 so passed in FCC No. 14 of 2013, but in course of hearing learned counsel for the Petitioner contended Petitioner has not availed any benefit from out of the certificate issued in his favour so cancelled vide the impugned order.

¶17

5.1. It is also contended that Petitioner will not raise any claim to get any benefit nor will assail the impugned order before any Court of law. It is also contended that children of the Petitioner have not availed any benefit by utilising the certificate so issued in his favour. It is accordingly contended that without interfering with the impugned order Petitioner be protected with regard to the direction contained in Para 6(iii) of the impugned order dt.26.08.2014.

¶18

Learned Addl. Govt. Advocate taking into account the submission made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that this Court may pass appropriate order in the matter.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties and considering the submissions made and the fact that Petitioner will not claim any benefit nor he will challenge the same in any manner and the fact that children of the Petitioner have not availed any benefit from out of the certificate which is not disputed, this Court while is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order dt.26.08.2014, only direct that no coercive action be taken against the Petitioner in terms of the direction contained in Para 6(iii) of the impugned order.

¶20

Page 2 of 3.

¶21

The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.

¶22

(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge

¶23

Sneha

¶24

Signature Not Verified

¶25

Digitally Signed Signed by: SNEHANJALI PARIDA Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 12-Dec-2024 17:08:51

¶26

Page 3 of 3.

Chandra S.Pradhani v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandra S.Pradhani v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prateek Rana Vs Secy., Bse

Bijayanand Pradhan Vs State of Orissa

Divisional Manager,New India Assurance C0.LTD. Vs Martin Jojo

Mohan Pradhani Vs State

B.M.,New India Assurance Co.Ltd. Vs Mungai Bhatra

Keshab Kollar Vs Biswanath Roy