Bideshi Meher v. Collector,Bargarh
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Orissa dismissed the Writ Petition as not pressed following the petitioner's counsel's memorandum of withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.1816 of 2013
Bideshi Meher
Petitioner
Mr. D. Moharana, Proxy Counsel
-versus-
Collector, Bargarh & others …. Opposite Parties
Mr. B. Panigrahi, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER
12.08.2024
Order No.
12.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Mr. D. Moharana, learned Proxy Counsel on behalf of Mr. G.N. Sahu, learned Counsel for the Petitioner is present and files a Memo for withdrawal of the Writ Petition, as not pressed. The said memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed, as not pressed.
Kanhu
(S. K. Mishra)
Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: KANHU BEHERA Designation: JUNIOR STENOGRAPHER Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack. Date: 13-Aug-2024 17:56:04
Bideshi Meher
Collector, Bargarh
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court