Petitioner challenged freezing of bank account via writ. Court noted pending appeals before State Commission. Petitioner directed to raise issues there. Writ disposed without adjudicating merits.
Writ petition disposed; petitioner to raise issues before State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 17152 of 2023
Hadubandhu Nayak
..…... Petitioner
Mr. Manoj Kumar Nayak, Adv.
-versus-
The Branch Manager, SBI, Ganjam & Others …... Opposite Parties Mr. P.V. Balakrishna, (for O.P.2)
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
ORDER
02.05.2024
Order No.
this Court to the Opposite Party No.1/Bank to release the amount of Rs.48,396/- of the Petitioner which has illegally been olding on the instruction of the Opposite Party No.3/the Assistant Provident Commissioner, Berhampur.
complaint case i.e. Consumer Complaint No.11 of 2015 filed
2
by the Petitioner against the Opposite Parties. But the Assistant Provident Commissioner had directed the Bank to freez/hold the amount of Rs.48,396/- of the Petitioner.
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Cuttack and the Digitally Signed Signed by: LITARAM MURMU Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Cuttack Location: High Court of Orissa Cuttack Date: 07-May-2024 12:00:56
shall consider all the points including the defreezing of the
3
account and dispose of the appeal vide F.A. No.119 of 2023 and F.A. No.219 of 2023 within one month from the date of presentation of this order.
( Dr. S.K. Panigrahi)
Judge
Murmu
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: LITARAM MURMU Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Cuttack Date: 07-May-2024 12:00:56
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed given that appeals are pending before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
Hadubandhu Nayak
The Branch Manager, SBI, Ganjam
The Assistant Provident Commissioner, Berhampur
S.K. Panigrahi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
