Writ petition disposed of after the petitioner's proxy counsel filed a memo stating he had been instructed by senior counsel to render no instruction; the court closed the matter for want of instruction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.17078 of 2021
Debesh Agarwal
Petitioner
Proxy Counsel
Vs.
State of Odisha and others
….. Opposite Parties
Mr. S.S. Kanungo, A.G.A. Mr. S.K. Mishra, Senior Advocate (for O.P. No.2)
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER
01.02.2024
Order No. The matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 5. 2. Mr. S.K. Mishra, learned Senior Advocate, being assisted by Mr. J. Pradhan, learned Counsel for the Opposite Party No.2 is present.
(S.K. MISHRA) JUDGE
Signature Not Verified
padma
Digitally Signed Signed by: PADMA CHARAN DASH Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUT TACK Date: 03-Feb-2024 17:03:18
Page 1 of 1
Debesh Agarwal
State of Odisha
Opposite Party No.2
Sanjay Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
