In this writ petition challenging the rejection of candidature by HPCL, the court disposed of the matter by observing that the petitioner should utilize the Grievance Redressal System under Clause-18 of the Brochure.
Observation directing the petitioner to avail the remedy under Clause-18 of the Brochure by approaching the Grievance Redressal System.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 30-Aug-2024 11:42:39
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 14092 OF 2024
Biprabar Kalta
…. Petitioner
Mr. Shiba Shankar Chaini, Advocate
on behalf of
Mr. Satyabrata Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
Union of India and others
…. Opp. Parties
Mr. Srinivas Patnaik, Advocate (For HPCL)
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
29.08.2024
Page 1 of 2
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 30-Aug-2024 11:42:39
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
ms
Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the rejection of candidature be disposed of by directing the petitioner to avail the grievance redressal system.
Biprabar Kalta
Union of India
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
