In a writ petition, the petitioners contended that the matter had become infructuous due to the efflux of time. The single judge disposed of the writ petition as infructuous without substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.1317 of 2020
Bhubananda Biswal and Others
…. Petitioners
Ms. P.P. Rao, Adv.
-versus-
State of Odisha and Others
…. Opposite Parties Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
04.11.2024
Order No
03. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that by efflux of time, the matter has become infructuous.
3. In view of such submission, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Basudev
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BASUDEV SWAIN Designation: SR. STENO Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 05-Nov-2024 16:23:47
Bhubananda Biswal and Others
State of Odisha and Others
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
