Brajabandhu Parida v. Commissioner of Endowment
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear when called.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.12579 of 2021
Brajabandhu Parida
.....
Petitioner
Represented By Adv. - M/s. Sudhansu Sekhar Jena, K.K. Swain, Ranjit Mohanty
-versus-
1) Commissioner Of Endowment ..... Opposite Parties 2) Sub Collector Cum Executive Represented By Officer Debottar Dept. Adv. - Pratyusha 3) I.I.C.Modle Police Station Naidu
Mr. G. N. Rout, ASC
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.DASH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER 14.05.2024
Order No.
(D.Dash)
Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: GITANJALI NAYAK Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 17-May-2024 19:17:34 Gitanjali
(V. Narasingh) Judge
Page 1 of 1.
Brajabandhu Parida
Commissioner Of Endowment
Sub Collector Cum Executive Officer Debottar Dept.
I.I.C.Modle Police Station
Kartik Panda
D. Dash
V. Narasingh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court