Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Jyotsar Panda Vs State and Ors. — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Orissa HC (2024)

Home
Orissa HC
2024
Jyotsar Panda Vs State and Ors.Jyotsar Panda v. State and Ors.

Dismissed

Jyotsar Panda v. State and Ors.

Orissa HC9 May 2024WP(C)/12067/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Orissa disposed of Writ Petition No. 12067 of 2013 filed by Jyotisar Panda as infructuous due to efflux of time.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 12067 of 2013

Jyotisar Panda

Petitioner

M/s. S.S. Satapathy and associates,

Advocates

Vs.

State of Odisha and others

….. Opposite Parties

State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

ORDER

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Jyotisar Panda
respondent
State of Odisha

Coram

AI extract

Dr. Justice B.R. Sarangi

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 9 May 2024 · May
Registered: 21 May 2013
Case no.: WP(C)/12067/2013

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from B.r.sarangi Gourishankar Satapathy

M/S.Jai Bholenath Industries Vs Sales Tax Officer
8 May 2024
Subasini Dehury Vs Commissioner-Cum-Secy.
8 May 2024
Pinakdhar Samantaray Vs Union of India
8 May 2024
State of Odisha Vs Trilok Sundar Mohanty
9 May 2024

Cite this judgement

Jyotsar Panda v. State and Ors., WP(C)/12067/2013 (OD), decided on 9 May 2024.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Dr. Justice B.R. Sarangi and Mr. Justice G. Satpathy

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The writ petition has been disposed of as infructuous by the court on the ground that the matter is barred by the efflux of time. No substantive legal proposition is laid down beyond the order of disposal.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

09.05.2024

Order No. This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner by filing a memo contended that by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous. The same be kept on record.

In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.

(DR. B.R. SARANGI)

JUDGE

(G. SATAPATHY) JUDGE

Signature Not Verified Priyajit

Digitally Signed Signed by: PRIYAJIT SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORI SSA Date: 13-May-2024 13:43:47

Page 1 of 1

Mr. Justice G. Satpathy

CNR

ODHC010039182013

Topic

Constitutional and Fundamental Rights

Bench

B.r.sarangi Gourishankar Satapathy

Disposal

Disposed Off

Tilottama Sahoo Vs the Principal Secy.,Excise Dept.,Bbsr

9 May 2024

Ashok Ku.Das Vs Union of India .

9 May 2024