Panda and Brothers v. G.M.,East Coast
Case brief
What is this about?
Orissa High Court, Cuttack; W.P.(C) No. 1181 of 2010; decided 01.03.2024 by Justice K.R. Mohapatra; writ petition DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION after counsel for both sides (Jyotirmaya Gupta for petitioner; Chandra Kanta Pradhan on behalf of Mahendra Kumar Pradhan for opposite parties) filed memos of 'no instruction'; matter taken up in hybrid mode. Subject matter: arrear ground rent for occupation of 615 sq. mtrs of land; prayer to revise the arrear ground rent and to modify it in terms of petitioner's letter dated 6th November 2001 to the Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, East Coast Railway, Khurda. Interim order dated 25.02.2010 passed in M.C. No. 1017 of 2010 vacated. Keywords: non-prosecution dismissal, no-instruction memo, arrear ground rent, railway land occupation, ground rent revision, vacatur of interim order, M/s. Panda and Brothers, General Manager, hybrid hearing.