The Court declined to entertain a writ petition seeking quashment of an order and notice under extraordinary jurisdiction, finding no grounds to interfere.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.11274 of 2024
1) Sri Sri Baladev Jew , Sidhal, ..... Petitioners Jagatsinghpur 2) Arun Ku Panda Represented By 3) Laxmidhara Panda Adv. - Binaya 4) Pradeep Kumar Panda Kumar Mohanty
-versus-
1) State Of Odisha ..... Opposite Parties 2) Commissioner Of Endowment Represented By Adv. 3) Addl. Asst Commissioner Of Mr. G.N. Rout, ASC Endowments, Cuttack
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.DASH AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
08.05.2024
Order No.
Page 1 of 1 .
Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed.
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
(D.Dash) Judge
(V. Narasingh) Judge
H
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: HIMANSU SEKHAR DASH Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 13-May-2024 12:10:50
Page 2 of 2 .
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Sri Baladev Jew, Sidhal
State Of Odisha
Commissioner Of Endowment
Addl. Asst Commissioner Of Endowments, Cuttack
Inspector Of Endowment
Sub-collector, Jagatsinghpur
D.Dash
V. Narasingh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
