Disposed¶21

Prasanta Kumar Moharana v. Ao, Idfc First Bank Ltd., Mumbai

Orissa HC16 May 2024WP(C)/11139/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

OTS One Time Settlement restructuring loan account Agreement No.72001375 IDFC First Bank SARFAESI Act 2002 RBI Guidelines interest waiver Article-226 Article-227 writ petition disposed observation borrower Prasanta Kumar Moharana Ranjan Kumar Nayak High Court of Orissa Cuttack D. Dash V. Narasingh 16.05.2024 hybrid mode urgent certified copy

What did the court decide?

No direct closure or waiver ordered; writ petition disposed of with an observation that upon the Petitioner filing an OTS/Restructuring application within two weeks, the Bank should consider it on its own merit, decide it per law and guidelines, and intimate the result within a week thereafter. ¶21

Prasanta Kumar Moharana Vs Ao, Idfc First Bank Ltd… — Banking and Recovery | Orissa HC (2024)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶21

Issue for consideration

Whether the Court should direct the Opposite Parties, particularly Opposite Party No.1, to close the outstanding loan amount of Rs. 40,654.85 against loan account/Agreement No. 72001375 in One Time Settlement as per the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and RBI Guidelines, with waiver of interest.

¶19

Court's answer

The Court disposed of the writ petition with an observation addressing the Petitioner's One Time Settlement request, rather than adjudicating the merits itself.

¶21

Ratio / Principle

In the event the Petitioner files an application for One Time Settlement/Restructuring of the loan account within two weeks, the Opposite Parties-Bank should consider it on its own merit and dispose of it in accordance with law and their guidelines at an early date, intimating the result to the Petitioner within a week thereafter.

¶23

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Orissa at Cuttack, WP(C) No.11139 of 2024, order dated 16.05.2024 (Justice D. Dash and Justice V. Narasingh): Prasanta Kumar Moharana v. Authorized officer, IDFC First Bank Ltd. Mumbai and The Branch Manager, IDFC First Bank Ltd. BBSR. Writ under Article-226 & 227 of the Constitution praying that Opposite Party No.1 close the loan amount of Rs.40.654.85 against loan account/Agreement No.72001375 in One Time Settlement as per the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and Guidelines of R.B.I., with waiver of interest. Court disposed of the petition with the observation that if the petitioner files an OTS/Restructuring application within two weeks, the Bank should consider it on its own merit, dispose of it per law and guidelines at an early date, and intimate the result within a week thereafter.

Prasanta Kumar Moharana v. Ao, Idfc First Bank Ltd., Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prasanta Kumar Moharana v. Ao, Idfc First Bank Ltd., Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prasanta Kumar Moharana Vs Authorised Officer, Idfc First Bank Ltd., Mumbai

Jayaram Motuani Vs Collector, Khurdha

Jugal Kishore Samal Vs State of Odisha

Krishnakanta Das Vs Union Bank of India, Puri

Ashutosh Mohapatra Vs PNB Bank, Bbsr

Binaya Bhanu Das Vs Commnr. of Endowments, Orissa