The High Court dismissed the writ appeal, holding that the impugned order of the Single Judge was correct in dismissing the appellant's second petition for the same relief, requiring no interference.
Dismissed the writ appeal with liberty to pursue remedies for non-compliance of a prior order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.A. No. 92 of 2024
Rasananda Basti
Appellant
Mr. Sidheswar Mallik, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Odisha and others Respondents Mr. M.K. Khuntia, Additional Government Advocate
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE D. DASH
Order No.
ORDER 15.02.2024
This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
Page 1 of 2
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh)
Chief Justice
(D. Dash) Judge
S. Behera/ S.K. Rout
Signature Not Verified
Page 2 of 2
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUMANTA BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 16-Feb-2024 12:11:19
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to interfere with the impugned order dated 19.12.2023 dismissing the second writ petition.
Rasananda Basti
State of Odisha and others
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
