State sought condonation of 351 days' delay in filing a writ appeal against an order dated 22.12.2022, filed on 06.01.2024. Relying on State of Odisha v. Surama Manjari Das (confirmed by the Supreme Court), the court found insufficient cause and no due diligence, dismissing both the interlocutory application and the writ appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.A. No.70 of 2024
State of odisha & Others
….. Appellants Mr. Biplab Mohanty, AGA
Vs.
Susama Mohanty & Others ….. Respondent
CORAM:
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DR. B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
ORDER
06.02.2024 W.A. No.70 of 2024 & I.A. No.28 of 2024
Page 1 of 2
05.04.2023 in S.L.P.(C) Diary No. 9259 of 2023.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
(M.S. RAMAN) JUDGE
Laxmikant
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: LAXMIKANT MOHAPATRA Designation: SENIOR STENOGRAPHER Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 06-Feb-2024 17:09:08
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 351 days in filing the writ appeal should be condoned for want of sufficient cause and due diligence.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Odisha v. Surama Manjari DasRelied on¶5
W.P.(C) No. 15763 of 2021 dismissed on 16.07.2021
S.L.P.(C) Diary No. 9259 of 2023Referred¶5
State of Odisha & Others
Susama Mohanty & Others
B.R. Sarangi
Murahari Sri Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
