Dismissed¶25

State of Odisha v. Bidyadhara Mishra

Orissa HC20 Nov 2024WA/662/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; State of Odisha v. Bidyadhar Mishra; W.A. No. 662 of 2023; Orissa High Court at Cuttack; decision dated 20.11.2024; challenge to order dated 7.9.2022 in W.P.(C) No.21769 of 2022; pensionary benefits parity with Narusu Pradhan; O.A. No. 1189(C) of 2006 order dated 11th June 2009; permission to withdraw; undertaking to file memo; K. C. Kar Government Advocate; Babita Kumari Pattanaik Advocate; hybrid mode hearing; Chakradhari Sharan Singh Chief Justice; Savitri Ratho Judge.

What did the court decide?

Writ appeal dismissed as withdrawn at the request of the State's counsel; no substantive relief granted or denied on merits; the impugned order dated 7.9.2022 in W.P.(C) No.21769 of 2022 remains untouched by this order. ¶25

State of Odisha Vs Bidyadhara Mishra — Orissa HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.A. No. 662 of 2023

¶3

State of Odisha and Others

¶4

…. Appellants

¶5

Mr. K. C. Kar, Government Advocate

¶6

-versus-

¶7

Bidyadhar Mishra

¶8

…. Respondents Ms. Babita Kumari Pattanaik, Advocate

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

ORDER

Order No.

20.11.2024

This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

¶15

This Writ Appeal has been filed praying for the following

¶16

reliefs;

¶17

“Under these circumstances the Appellants most humbly pray that this Hon’ble Court be graciously pleased to admit this appeal, call for the records and after hearing the parties be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated 7.9.2022 passed in W.P.(C) No.21769 of 2022.

¶18

And for this act of kindness, the Appellants shall as duty bound ever pray.”

¶19

The operative portion of the impugned order in W.P.(C) No.

¶20

21769 of 2022 is extracted below;-

¶21

Page 1 of 2

¶22

“In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present writ petition is allowed and the Opposite Parties are directed to grant similar benefits to the Petitioner as has been done in the case of Narusu Pradhan vide order dated 11th June, 2009 passed in O.A. No. 1189(C) of 2006. The Petitioner is directed to appear before the Opposite Party No.l & 4 along with certified copy of this order and all other relevant documents and records for the processing of his claim. The Opposite Party No.l & 4 upon receipt of certified copy of this order shall calculate and pay the benefits payable to the Petitioner, particularly his pensionary benefits, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.”

¶23