State appealed against a Single Judge order directing that a doctor's suspension period be treated as on duty after disciplinary proceedings ended in minor punishment of stoppage of two increments. The Division Bench upheld the Single Judge's view and dismissed the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.A. No. 49 of 2024
State of Odisha, represented through its … Commissioner-cum-Secretary to Govt., Health and Family Welfare Department, Lokseva Bhawan, Bhubaneswar, DistKhurda
Appellant
Mr. K.C. Kar, Government Advocate
-versus-
Dr. Truptirani Naik, aged about 59 … Respondents years, W/o. Pradip Kumar Panigrahi, Ayurvedic Medical Officer, Government Ayurvedic Dispensary, Kudutuli, DistKandhamal and others
Mr. Laxman Pradhan, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
Order No.
04.11.2024
Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3
punishment of withholding of increments without cumulative effect which has been imposed.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh) Chief Justice
(Savitri Ratho) Judge
SK Jena/Secy.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANJAY KUMAR JENA Designation: SECRETARY Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack. Date: 06-Nov-2024 20:00:48
Page 3 of 3
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bani Bhusan Das Vs. State of Odisha and othersRelied on
W.P.(C) No.7635 of 2019 decided on 28.10.2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State of Odisha, represented through Commissioner-cum-Secretary to Govt., Health and Family Welfare Department
Dr. Truptirani Naik
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
