The Chief Justice dismissed the intra-court appeal as barred by limitation, refusing to condone the delay despite the affidavit admiting the earlier order was affirmed by the Supreme Court.
The application for condonation of delay was granted, but the appeal was dismissed. No other relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.A. No. 448 of 2024
State of Odisha and Others
… Appellants
Mr. Saswat Das, Addl. Govt. Advocate
-versus-
Binod Kumar Sahu and Others …
Respondents
None
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
Order No.
22.10.2024
This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
Page 1 of 2
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh) Chief Justice
(Savitri Ratho) Judge
SK Jena/Secy.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANJAY KUMAR JENA Designation: SECRETARY Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack. Date: 23-Oct-2024 14:42:00
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the intra-court appeal is barred by limitation.
Whether the writ appeal should be dismissed in light of the Supreme Court's order.
State of Odisha
Binod Kumar Sahu
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
