A transfer petition was dismissed after the petitioner's counsel rendered no instruction and filed a memo stating so; the associated interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
TRP(C) No.48 of 2018
Sabita Sahoo
Petitioner
Mr. D. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
Rajanikanta Sahu
…. Opposite Party
Mr. S. Khan, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER
07.12.2024
Order No.
04.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Mr. D. Sahoo, learned Counsel for the Petitioner is present and renders no instruction. He files a memo to the said effect in the Court. The same be kept on record.
3. Accordingly, the Transfer Petition stands dismissed due to want of instruction.
4. Interim order dated 04.04.2018 passed in Misc. Case No.57 of 2018 stands vacated.
5. Office is directed to communicate a copy of this order to the Court below.
(S.K. Mishra)
Mona
Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MONALISA SWAIN Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Odisha Date: 09-Dec-2024 10:49:37
Sabita Sahoo
Rajanikanta Sahu
Sanjay Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
