Transfer application dismissed for want of merit; however, considering the ailments of petitioner Nos. 1 & 3, they were permitted to depose evidence through virtual court facility.
Petitioners Nos. 1 and 3 permitted to depose evidence via virtual court facility.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK TRP(C) No.14 of 2024
Sumitra Sahoo and others
Petitioners
Mr. N. Lenka, Advocate
-versus-
Umesh Chandra Sahoo and … Opposite Parties others
CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER(ORAL)
05.02.2024
Order No.
01.
Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).
(G. Satapathy) Judge
Signature Not Verified S. Sasmal
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHASMITA SASMAL Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 06-Feb-2024 18:24:09
Sumitra Sahoo and others
Umesh Chandra Sahoo
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
