Dismissed
Tuloram v. Sodan
Orissa HCSA/388/1989
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
High Court of Orissa disposed of the second appeal by dismissing it for non-prosecution due to the appellant's lack of appearance and lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
¶2
SA No.388 of 1989
¶3
Tuloram Keota ..... Appellant(s) Represented By None
¶4
-versus-
¶5
Sadan Keuta & Others ..... Respondent(s) Represented By None
¶6
CORAM:
¶7
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
¶8
ORDER
¶9
Order No. 12.12.2024
¶10
- This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).
¶11
- None appears from either side.
¶12
- Due to none appearance of the appellant or his learned counsel to pursue the appeal for its further progress itself going to show that, the appellant has no interest to pursue the appeal for its further progress.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Tuloram Keota
- respondent
Sadan Keuta
- respondent
Others
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court