Dismissed
Tila v. Kabul
Orissa HCSA/373/1998
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellants failed to provide instructions, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the matter further. The court disposed of the appeal accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK SA No.373 of 1998
¶2
Tila Sahu & Others Appellant(s)
¶3
Mr. C. Nayak, Adv. on behalf of Mr. J. Mishra, Advocate
¶4
-versus-
¶5
Kabul Nag & Others
¶6
…. Respondent(s) Mr. N.R. Panda, Advocate on behalf of Mr. S.K.Purohit, Advocate
¶7
CORAM:
¶8
MR. JUSTICE A.C. BEHERA
¶9
ORDER
¶10
Order No.
¶11
24.01.2024
¶12
- This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Tila Sahu & Others
- respondent
Kabul Nag & Others
Coram
AI extract
A.C. BEHERA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court