Mittal Transport v. Sakuntala
Case brief
What is this about?
An appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellants' counsel had no instructions to proceed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK R SA No.340 of 1999
M/s. Mittal Transport Service & Appellant(s) Another
Represented by Mr. B. Behera, Advocate appearing on behalf of Mr. S.P. Mishra, Senior Advocate
-versus-
Sakuntala Gupta (dead) …. Respondent(s) Represented by None
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE A.C. BEHERA
ORDER
Order No.
25.06.2024
- This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Mittal Transport Service
- respondent
Sakuntala Gupta (dead)
Coram
A.C. Behera
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court