Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Raibu Vs Raibari — Orissa HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

Home
Orissa HC
2024
Raibu Vs RaibariRaibu v. Raibari

Dismissed

Raibu v. Raibari

Orissa HC8 Jan 2024SA/273/1992

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant gave no instructions to counsel and showed no interest in pursuing the appeal.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

SA No.273 of 1992

Sri Raibu @ Rahidas Mohanta Appellant(s) Ms. Sakshi Rout, Adv On behalf of Mr. S.P. Mishra.Sr.Adv.

-versus-

Raibari Mohanta & Others

…. Respondent(s)

None.

CORAM:

MR. JUSTICE A.C. BEHERA

ORDER

Order No.

08.01.2024

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
Sri Raibu @ Rahidas Mohanta
respondent
Raibari Mohanta & Others

Coram

AI extract

A.C. Behera

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 8 Jan 2024 · January
Registered: 21 Dec 1992
Case no.: SA/273/1992

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Ananda Chandra Behera

Harekrushna Muduli Vs Tunga Dei
5 Jan 2024
Guru Vs Sankha
5 Jan 2024
Madan Mohan Naik Vs Rikhiram
5 Jan 2024
Benumadhab Vs Pravabati
8 Jan 2024
Purna Ch. Pradhan Vs Ganesh Ch. Nag

Cite this judgement

Raibu v. Raibari, SA/273/1992 (OD), decided on 8 January 2024.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

A.C. Behera

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The appellant's counsel stated there was no instruction from the appellant, indicating disinterest in pursuing the appeal. The court accordingly dismissed the second appeal for non-prosecution and disposed of it. The order decides nothing of general application.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

This Matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that there is no instruction from the side of the appellant.

The above conduct of the appellant is going to show that they are not interested to pursue the appeal further.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for its non-prosecution by the appellant.

Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of being dismissed.

( A.C. Behera ) Judge

Binayak

CNR

ODHC010022271992

Bench

Ananda Chandra Behera

Disposal

Disposed Off

8 Jan 2024

Raghab Ch. Bhoi Vs Benudhar Sahu

8 Jan 2024