Sarat Ch.Nayak v. Narahari Parida
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; appellants gave no instructions to pursue appeal; appeal disposed of finally. Bench: MR. JUSTICE A.C. BEHERA (single judge). Case: SA No.105 of 2002, High Court of Orissa at Cuttack, decided 04.10.2024. Parties: Sarat Chandra Nayak @ Biswal & Others (appellants; counsel Mr. D. Behera for Mr. P.K. Nanda) v. Narahari Parida (respondent, unrepresented). Matter heard through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode). No statutes, sections, precedents, issues or monetary amounts appear in the text; record is useful only as evidence of a procedural (non-substantive) disposal.
What did the court decide?
Since counsel for the appellants reported that there were no instructions to prosecute the appeal further, the appellants were found not to be interested in pursuing the appeal. ¶¶3