High Court dismissed an appeal in R.S.A. No.516 of 2016 because the appellant was deceased and no substitution of legal representatives had been effectuated, making further proceedings impossible.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
R.S.A. No.516 of 2016
Arun Kumar Sahu …. Appellant Mr. D. Pr. Dhal, Advocate
-versus-
Prabhat Chandra Chand & Others
…. Respondents
Order No.
CORAM: JUSTICE D.DASH ORDER 05.03.2024
Signature Not Verified
(D. Dash) Judge
Digitally Signed Signed by: GITANJALI NAYAK Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Gitanjali Location: OHC Date: 13-Mar-2024 18:02:34
Page 1 of 1
Arun Kumar Sahu
Prabhat Chandra Chand & Others
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
