The sole appellant died during the pendency of the appeal. As no application for substitution was filed for a long time, the appeal was dismissed for abatement. Legal representatives were permitted to file an application for substitution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RSA No.196 of 2016
Subani Sethi
…. Appellant Mr. D. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
Sanatan Biswal & Others
…. Respondents
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH
ORDER
Order No.
27.02.2024
It would, however be open for the legal representatives of the Appellant to file necessary applications for substitution, setting aside, abatement by condoning the delay for their consideration in accordance with law.
(D. Dash) Judge
Gitanjali
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: GITANJALI NAYAK Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 04-Mar-2024 13:07:22
Subani Sethi
Sanatan Biswal & Others
D.Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
