Dismissed¶19
Muralidhar Sahoo v. State
Orissa HCRSA/128/2003
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Orissa High Court, Cuttack — RSA No.128 of 2003, Muralidher Sahoo & others v. State of orissa & another — Coram: A.C. Behera, J. — Order dated 11.01.2024 — Appeal dismissed for default due to complete non-appearance of appellants and their counsel; State appeared through P. Bharadwaj, ASC. Dismissal for want of prosecution; no merits decided; useful only as an example of dismissal for default under RSA.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed for default of the appellants, whose continued non-appearance demonstrated that they had no interest in prosecuting the appeal further. ¶18