Ruby Pradhan v. Ganesh Ch.Nayak
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal disposed of for want of instruction as counsel for the appellant had no instructions.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MATA No.48 of 2016
….. Ruby Pradhan Appellant Mr. B.K. Nayak on behalf of Mr. A.K. Sahoo, Advocate Vs. ….. Ganesh Chandra Nayak Respondent Mr. S. Behera, Advocate
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
ORDER
19.02.2024
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
15.
2. Mr. B.K. Nayak, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. A.K.
Sahoo, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has no
instruction in the matter.
- In view of the above, the appeal stands disposed of for want
of instruction.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
RJ/Alok (M.S. SAHOO)
JUDGE
Signature Not Verified
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ruby Pradhan
- respondent
Ganesh Chandra Nayak
Coram
B.R. Sarangi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court