The single judge bench held that the court is not inclined to entertain the current judgment petition as the paper book has already been prepared, and disposed of the matter. The judgment noted the appellant is a party in a subjudiced CRLA.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
JCRLA No. 24 of 2023
Muna Mohanty
…. Appellant
Mrs. B. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Respondent Mr. Arupananda Das, Addl. Govt. Advocate
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
ORDER
Order No.
24.06.2024
(S.K. Sahoo)
Judge
Signature Not Verified
(Chittaranjan Dash)
Digitally Signed Signed by: ANANTA KUMAR PRADHAN Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORI SSA Date: 25-Jun-2024 10:27:50 A.K. Pradhan/ Bijay
Judge
Muna Mohanty
State of Odisha
S.K. Sahoo
Chittaranjan Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
