Claimants appealed against Railway Claims Tribunal judgment directing 90% of compensation to fixed deposit. Appeal covered by Court's earlier decision in FAO No.262 of 2020; appeal disposed of on same principles, ordering disbursement with 50% shares kept in five-year fixed deposits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
FAO No.372 of 2024
Subnam Bano and others
…. Appellants Mr. S. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
Union of India and another
…. Respondents Ms. B. Tripathy, C.G.C. for UoI
CORAM: JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
22.08.2024
Order No.
Signature Not Verified
Page 1 of 2
Digitally Signed Signed by: BASANTA KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 23-Aug-2024 17:51:41
( B.P. Routray) Judge
B.K. Barik
Signature Not Verified
Page 2 of 2
Digitally Signed Signed by: BASANTA KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 23-Aug-2024 17:51:41
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Tribunal's direction to keep 90% of compensation in fixed deposit should be modified in favour of the claimants?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
FAO No.262 of 2020Followed¶4
Subnam Bano and others
Union of India and another
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
