Padma Naik v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellant sought permission to withdraw the first appeal; counsel filed a memo for withdrawal and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
FAO No.21 of 2023
Smt. Padma Naik
…. Appellant
Mr. Sambit Das, Advocate
-versus-
Union of India, represented through its General Manager, East Coast Railway, Zonal Head Quarter, E. Co.R Sadan, Samant Vihar, Bhubaneswar
…. Respondent
CORAM: SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
24.4.2024
Order No.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Padma Naik
- respondent
Union of India, represented through its General Manager, East Coast Railway, Zonal Head Quarter, E. Co.R Sadan, Samant Vihar, Bhubaneswar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court