Babu Sahu v. Ramesh Ch.Sahu
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil revision (CRP No.41 of 2004), High Court of Orissa at Cuttack, disposed of for lack of instruction on 10.09.2024 by M.S. Raman, J. Counsel Sagar Ranjan Panigrahi for petitioners filed no-instruction memo after petitioners refused Registered Post letter seeking instructions; respondents (opposite parties through L.Rs) represented by Budhhadev Routray, Senior Advocate, with J. Biswal, Advocate. Matter ended without adjudication on merits; no relief granted, no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
The CRP stands disposed of for lack of instruction, in view of the memo filed by learned counsel for the petitioners stating that he had no instructions to proceed further. ¶15