Civil revision petition filed under a misconception regarding suit valuation below Rs.5,00,000; petitioner sought withdrawal with liberty to approach the District Judge, Khurda. The High Court disposed of the CRP as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRP No.24 of 2024
Puspalata Sahoo …. Petitioner
Mr. Prasanta Kumar Nayak, Advocate -versus-
Debraj Routray and another
…. Opposite Parties Mr. Siddharth Priyadarsan, Advocate on behalf of Mr. S.K.Dash, Advocate
CORAM:
Order No. 01.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN ORDER 16.08.2024.
This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
(M.S. Raman) Judge
Suchitra
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUCHITRA BEHERA Designation: JUNIOR STENOGRAPHER Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 16-Aug-2024 19:54:41
Page 1 of 1
Puspalata Sahoo
Debraj Routray
Another
Murahari Sri Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
