The High Court of Orissa dismissed the revision petition for non-prosecution, noting that the petitioners lost interest to pursue a matter after an order in 2012 due to the efflux of time from the original 2011 filing.
The CRP stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRP No.18 of 2011
Ramaballav Lenka and others …. Petitioners None
-versus-
…. The Rotary Foundation of Rotary Opposite Parties International and another
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Order No. 03.
ORDER 25.06.2024
This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
(M.S. Raman) Judge
Signature Not Verified Suchitra
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUCHITRA BEHERA Designation: JUNIOR STENOGRAPHER Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 25-Jun-2024 18:33:13
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to the appellant losing interest to pursue the matter after an order dated 12.10.2012.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramaballav Lenka and others
The Rotary Foundation of Rotary Opposite Parties International and another
Murahari Sri Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
