Revision petition challenging the trial court's refusal to release seized items. The High Court observed the trial court had already granted liberty to approach the PS and disposed of the petition without further directions.
Liberty granted to approach the Police Station for release of seized items.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLREV No.254 of 2024
Rutuparna Panda
…. Petitioner Mr. S.N. Mishra (4), Advocate
-Versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite party Mr. N.K. Praharaj, AGA
CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
01.08.2024
Order No.
(This matter is taken up through virtual mode)
Page 1 of 2
6. Accordingly, it is ordered.
(R.K. Pattanaik) Judge
Rojina
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ROJINA SAHOO Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, CTC Date: 03-Aug-2024 11:39:00
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the release of seized items after the husband's acquittal when the trial court directed the petitioner to approach the PS?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rutuparna Panda
State of Odisha
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
