The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous petition alleging inaction in registering an FIR. The Court, relying on Lalita Kumari, directed the police to act in terms of the judgment and disposed of the petition.
Direction given to IIC of Sadar P.S to act in terms of Lalita Kumari judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMP No. 600 of 2024
Manjulata Behera
Petitioner
Mr. M. Pagal, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
Opposite Parties
Mr. T.K. Praharaj, SC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
Order No.
22.04.2024
Signature Not Verified5.
Digitally Signed Signed by: SOUMYA RANJAN SAMAL Designation: Jr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 23-Apr-2024 18:24:56
(V. NARASINGH) Judge
Soumya
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the police should have registered an FIR based on the petitioner's complaint dated 23.12.2023?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lalita KumariRelied on¶17
Lalita Kumari vs. Government of U.P. & others, AIR 2014 SC 187 · Who else cites this
Manjulata Behera
State of Odisha & Others
V. Narasingh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
