In a Criminal Leave to Appeal regarding non-registration of FIR, the Court noted that the FIR was subsequently registered at Salipur P.S. Consequently, no further order was passed and the petition was disposed of as moot.
CRLMP disposed of with no further order as grievance redressed by registration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMP No. 260 of 2024
Rajalaxmi Rana
…. Petitioner
Mr. B. Tripathy, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. H.K. Panigrahi, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER 15.03.2024 Order No. 02. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The grievance of the Petitioner is non-registration of the FIR. 3. Learned counsel for the State, on instruction, submits that in the meanwhile, the FIR filed at the instance of the Petitioner has been registered as Salipur P.S. Case No.113 of 2024.
(V. NARASINGH) Judge
Santoshi
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANTOSHI LENKA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 16-Mar-2024 13:11:31
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition requiring registration of FIR should be allowed in light of completed registration.
Rajalaxmi Rana
State of Odisha
V. Narasimha?
V. Narsingh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
