The High Court of Orissa dismissed a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition challenging improper investigation in a criminal case, stating it was not inclined to entertain the application at the nascent investigation stage but granted liberty to renew prayers later.
Liberty granted to renew prayers at a later stage if grievances exist.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 1742 of 2024
Sidhartha Prusty ….
Petitioner
Mr. A.K. Mohapatra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & …. Opposite Parties Others
Mr. S. Panigrahi, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH ORDER 19.12.2024
Order No.
(V. NARASINGH) Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Judge
Digitally Signed Signed by: AYESHA ROUT Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: AuthenticationAyesha Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 20-Dec-2024 11:13:37
Page 1 of 1
Sidhartha Prusty
State of Odisha
V. NARASINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
