Petitioner sought withdrawal of his criminal miscellaneous application; counsel did not want to press it, and the High Court dismissed the CRLMC as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.146 of 2024
Ramakanta Digal ..……. Petitioner
Mr. Mahes Das, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Odisha ..……. Opposite Party
Mr. B.K. Ragada,
Additional Government Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE SIBO SANKAR MISHRA
ORDER
16.02.2024
Order No.
01. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this
application.
2. Accordingly, the CRLMC is dismissed as not pressed.
(S.S. Mishra)
Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Subhasis/P.A. Signed by: SUBHASIS MOHANTY Designation: P.A. Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack. Date: 16-Feb-2024 17:47:00
Ramakanta Digal
State of Odisha
Sibo Sankar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
